Visit jeffs's column >>

JEFFSHome Page

Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 35; Links Seeded: 141
Member Since: 2/2006Last Seen: 7/23/2007

Staving Off Unrest in China

advertisement

PRC Legislative Agenda

Xinhua is the official press agency of the People's Republic of China (PRC), and has been called "the world's biggest propaganda agency" by Reporters Without Borders. PRC legislators are beginning their annual meetings, so Xinhua reports on their primary areas of concern probably point towards at least some of the central concerns for the PRC government over the near-term future. A report datelined BEIJING, March 3 (Xinhua) lists "8 issues of public concern" for the legislators:

  1. EMPLOYMENT: [T]he employment situation in rural areas remains difficult, with rural laborers continuing to migrate to cities in search of work
  2. SOCIAL SECURITY: Only a small proportion of [...] people are covered by the country's social security system.
  3. MEDICARE: 49 percent of [...] couldn't afford to see a doctor
  4. EDUCATION: [The] nine-year compulsory education system, which is supposed to be free and to cover the whole country, does not yet reach all rural areas. In the cities, parents who want to get their kids into top schools find that they have to fork out extra money.
  5. WORKPLACE SAFETY: While work safety is improving, the situation remains grim and compares badly with other countries.
  6. INCOME GAP: The income gap is widening [and indicators of income distribution equality are] worse than the United States.
  7. LAND EXPROPRIATION: More than 65 percent of rural "mass incidents" are linked to land expropriation issues.
  8. ENVIRONMENT: 70 percent of [the country's] rivers and lakes are polluted and more than 300 million people have no access to clean water.

Themes & Commonalities

Modernization is a concept in the sphere of social sciences that refers to [a] process in which society goes through industrialization, urbanization and other social changes that completely transform the lives of individuals.
from Wikipedia article

Modernization is clearly a core problem running through many of the elements on their list. Modernization has been driving the "economic boom" and also the massive migration of rural laborers "to cities in search of work". Almost 22 million of those urban Chinese have no work, those who have work have little workplace safety, the income gap between the rich and the poor is widening, rural land is being expropriated for private profit, and the environment is degrading. What the PRC leadership fears above all is too-rapid social changes leading to social disharmony and weakening the Party.

The classic problem with rapid industrialization and urbanization is to manage the social changes. The list of problems above could have been written in about the same form about most countries in the developed world in their own periods of rapid industrialization. What the PRC government seems to feel it needs is continued economic growth through industrialization, which requires unrestricted energy and results in rapid urbanization.

As I pointed out in an earlier Newsvine article, the PRC President spent a big part of late 2006 touring oil-rich countries and signing trade treaties. They are making deals with anyone they can find who can supply energy for their industrialization push. They are riding the tiger of growth and change through rapid industrialization.

Given the long history of governments in the West mis-understanding PRC intent, the chances of conflict between East & West unintentionally erupting over access to energy resources seem dangerously high. I pointed out in another earlier article, the enormous trade deficits between the US and the PRC mean a dangerous dependence by the US on PRC financing. Given the recent experience of sneezing on the PRC stock exchanges leading to severe colds on Western stock exchanges, we can look forward to more jitteriness in the West every time there are market problems in the PRC. And make no mistake about it, markets in a huge nation going through rapid modernization are going to be relatively unstable.

  • 5 Votes
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
3.8
{"commentId":565869,"authorDomain":"200MilesUp"}

I was talking to a professor who studies China who says in his opinion China will go back to a second Communist era once its economic development reaches a certain peak. His basis for saying this is related to the fact that the Communists resorted to Communism solely to modernise as you identify here, get economic power and integrate with the global economy thus increasing the chance that a Communist China wil not be subjugated by economic means as the USSR was. What do you think about this.

{"commentId":565869,"threadId":"81770","contentId":"597791","authorDomain":"200MilesUp"}
  • 2 votes
Reply#1 - Sun Mar 4, 2007 1:57 PM EST
{"commentId":566121,"authorDomain":"jeffsonstein"}
What do you think about this.

Opinions R Us <grin/>

I think the leaders of the PRC want to find a form of socialism at the end of the Modernization Road, but I am not sure it will much resemble Communism, per se. I think the problem for them is finding a route to "economic development" which does not entail massive social disruption. Such social disruptions pose a severe threat to the leading role of the Party in China, and that is not desired.

Defending Against Loss of Power

[they] resorted to Communism solely to modernise as you identify here, get economic power and integrate with the global economy thus increasing the chance that a Communist China will not be subjugated by economic means as the USSR was.

I am not too sure about the analogy with the former USSR, nor that the Party in China fears that result exactly. The Chinese have a very long history of outsiders attempting to subjugate their people through economic means, and also a very long history of successfully avoiding such subjugation by outsiders. While attempts to conquer China in the past (including attempts involving economic means) have not generally succeeded, they have generally resulted in long periods of social unrest and peasant misery. This is what the Party leadership wishes to avoid in the PRC above all else, in my humble opinion. Chaos threatens the supremacy of the Party in China, and thus is to be avoided at all costs.

Fear & Loathing

What I fear is that the emerging global energy crisis will drive China into a deadly competition with the advanced industrial societies. Should this pattern be allowed to fully mature, I fear a return to a bi-polar geo-political view accompanied by proxy-force wars in energy-rich regions. I loath the idea that we may be returning to a warped and self-fulfilling political perception-set on both sides that relations in the world must be ruled by the struggles of West against East for power (literally). Should this happen, the peoples of Africa and the Middle East will (once again) be seen as "bit players", as mere blades of grass trapped beneath the feet of warring elephants.

A struggle between giants which need not happen seems like it is shaping up, and the center of the whirlwind seems to be in Africa. These sorts of struggles generally result in a lot of "collateral damage" amongst more-or-less innocent bystanders. In my humble opinion, the less of that nonsense there is in the world, the better off we all are.

{"commentId":566121,"threadId":"81770","contentId":"597791","authorDomain":"jeffsonstein"}
  • 3 votes
#1.1 - Sun Mar 4, 2007 4:41 PM EST
Reply
{"canLink":false,"threadId":"81770","isPrivate":false}
Leave a Comment:
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
{"threadId":"81770","contentId":"597791"}
Start TrackingStart Tracking
Stop TrackingStop Tracking